Working Papers
Dec 30, 2025
6
Minutes read

The Anatomy of Bus Stops

Authors
Gregory Ho Wai Son
Elisabeth Chan Wen Yi
Elisabeth Chan Wen Yi
Tan Hui Hui
Tan Hui Hui
Key Takeaways
Data Sets Overview

Bus stop infrastructure across Greater KL is structurally inadequate.  A computer vision assessment of more than 5,000 bus stop images shows that most stops lack essential amenities such as shelters, benches, lighting, and clear signage. These deficiencies are widespread, with little to no moderate-high quality bus stop amenities distributed across geographical clusters.

Amenity gaps meaningfully affect perceived waiting time, safety and the decision to use public transport. Evidence from the literature suggests that poor waiting environments increase perceived wait durations on the part of the rider. This reduces feelings of safety, and discourage use, particularly among groups that are more sensitive to how safety and comfort is experienced.

Two policy interventions offer immediate improvements.  A national bus stop design standard would establish minimum requirements for safety, accessibility and comfort, guiding bus stop upgrades across jurisdictions. Real-time arrival information systems, through countdown displays reduce uncertainty and significantly improve perceived waiting time even when bus frequency remains unchanged.

the-anatomy-of-bus-stops
Working Papers
Preliminary papers sharing early-stage research, concepts, or findings. These papers highlight areas of current inquiry and are often precursors to more developed Discussion Papers or Reports.
Disclaimer
As we transition to a digital-first communication and continue building our knowledge hub, publications released before October 2025 are preserved in their original format. Publications released from October 2025 onward adopt a new, digitally friendly format for easier online reading. The official versions of earlier publications, including their original language and formatting, remain available in the downloadable PDF.

Summary

• Bus stop infrastructure across Greater KL is structurally inadequate. A computer vision assessment of more than 5,000 bus stop images shows that most stops lack essential amenities such as shelters, benches, lighting, and clear signage. These deficiencies are widespread, with little to no moderate-high quality bus stop amenities distributed across geographical clusters.

•Amenity gaps meaningfully affect perceived waiting time, safety and the decision to use public transport. Evidence from the literature suggests that poor waiting environments increase perceived wait durations on the part of the rider. This reduces feelings of safety, and discourage use, particularly among groups that are more sensitive to how safety and comfort is experienced.

•Two policy interventions offer immediate improvements. A national bus stop design standard would establish minimum requirements for safety, accessibility and comfort, guiding bus stop upgrades across jurisdictions. Real-time arrival information systems, through countdown displays reduce uncertainty and significantly improve perceived waiting time even when bus frequency remains unchanged.

Read Full Publication

Article highlight

featured report

Conclusion

Attributes
Footnotes
References
Photography Credit

Related to this Publication

No results found for this selection
You can  try another search to see more

Want more stories like these in your inbox?

Stay ahead with KRI, sign up for research updates, events, and more

Thanks for subscribing. Your first KRI newsletter will arrive soon—filled with fresh insights and research you can trust.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us On Our Socials