.png)
- Global disaster costs reached USD2.29 trillion in 2023, exposing a protection gap where most climate-induced losses remain uninsured. Guided by the Sendai Framework, Malaysia’s National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy 2030 provides the foundation to use insurance for managing economic losses. This paper evaluates whether insurance can evolve from a reactive payer into a strategic tool to cushion the country from climate impacts and promote fiscal stability.
- Disrupted monsoon patterns and water management gaps have significantly intensified the frequency and severity of pluvial and fluvial flooding. The rise in affected individuals and families between 2015 and 2024 has strained Malaysia’s strategic coordination and national disaster resources. This increasing climate volatility necessitates a shift from reactive emergency aid toward integrating insurance into Malaysia’s broader adaptation strategy to ensure national resilience.
- Insurers face four critical hurdles, namely limited access to localised data, risk models that do not account for climate acceleration, a reliance on short-term (12-month) policies, and a reinsurance market with a conservative risk appetite. These barriers discourage insurers from long-term risk coverage and influence their capacity in the market; without addressing data gaps and model sophistication, climate insurance will remain reactive rather than a sustainable tool for resilience.
- A significant capacity gap exists across both the public and private sectors, despite shared recognition of insurance as a useful tool for post-disaster recovery. While insurance serves as a secondary complement to broader resilience measures, its effectiveness is currently limited by data gaps and a lack of integration between government policy and market products. Further evolution requires moving beyond compensation toward equitable, cross-sectoral risk sharing that fosters long-term adaptation and national financial stability.
